Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Where do candidates stand? MCC survey has answers


By Maria Wiering
mwiering@CatholicReview.org
Abortion, immigration and education were among issues on which the Maryland Catholic Conference surveyed candidates for Congress, governor and Maryland’s General Assembly in anticipation of the June 24 primary election.
View the survey results here
Candidates were asked to agree or disagree with five statements. Candidates for both local and national office were asked about their views on late-term abortion, funding for nonpublic schools, immigration and poverty. The survey also asked state candidates about physician-assisted suicide, and congressional candidates about conscience protection legislation.
Responding to the survey were 17 congressional candidates, five gubernatorial candidates and 155 candidates for the Maryland State Senate and House of Delegates.
About 28 percent of respondents did not respond to all five questions. Agreeing with all five statements were seven congressional candidates and 22 General Assembly candidates. Only one responding candidate disagreed with all five statements.
Candidates also provided short written statements, which are available online at mdcathcon.org. Mary Ellen Russell, MCC executive director, recommends voters read them.
“They’re very revealing and give much more context for how they’re answering the questions,” she said.
She said the MCC, which advocates for public policy on behalf of the state’s bishops, was “very happy” with the response rate, but encouraged Catholics to reach out directly to campaigns to learn the position of candidates who did not respond.
She also emphasized the importance of voting in the primary, and hopes Catholics take candidates’ responses with them into the voting booth.
“I hope people are aware of how few votes some of these races are decided on,” Russell said. “So many races in Maryland are decided in the primary, and candidates can easily win by less than 100 votes, so every single vote is very important.”
State redistricting takes effect this year; the MCC advises voters to be aware of changes to the districts of some incumbent legislators. The primary election determines which candidates will run on their party’s ticket in the general election Nov. 4.
Also see:

Catholic Review

The Catholic Review is the official publication of the Archdiocese of Baltimore.

En español »