Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Statement on Council Bill 09-0406, “Limited-Service Pregnancy Centers Disclaimers’

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:

I offer this statement in opposition to Council Bill 09-0406, which would fine pregnancy resource centers in Baltimore City $500 a day for failing to post a list of services they do not provide.

Let’s be clear first about what these centers do provide, namely, needed and welcome services, free of charge, to your constituents who are struggling to find help in carrying a pregnancy to term. These centers partner with and accept referrals from city and state agencies, because they provide services and materials that few others in the City provide. The centers work with communities and congregations of all denominations throughout the city, serving hundreds of women who have nowhere else to turn. The provide material and emotional support throughout pregnancy, and offer parenting skills, formula and diapers to new mothers when money is tight and they’re running low.

There is also no doubt about what these centers do not provide, namely abortion or comprehensive birth control services. The legislation before you would required these centers to disclose this fact, and penalize them for not doing so.

On the surface, it may seem there should be little reason for objecting to this legislation. If it is clear what these centers do and do not provide, why should they object to this legislation? Perhaps some of you, and many other members of the City Council, agreed to co-sponsor this legislation on this presumption.

Any yet we do object, vigorously.

Having faced a similar statewide effort two years ago which also targeted pregnancy resource centers, we know full well that this legislation is intended to single out these centers precisely because of their mission. these centers exist to give support, and yes, encouragement, to women facing a crisis pregnancy, in the hope they will choose to bring their child to term.

Sadly, in the minds of some, this is a mission worth hindering. One may reasonably wonder how such an act seeks the common ground that many have called for in our country’s debate between those who are pro-life or pro-choice.

As City Council members, you know all too well how deeply scarred our families, our neighborhoods, and our city streets are by a loss of hope, and a lack of respect for the gift of life. In the midst of these challenges, the pregnancy resource centers targeted by this legislation offer a glimpse of hope to women who understandably may feel there is no point in bringing a child into the world. It is deplorable to suggest that their good work, simply because it openly serves a pro-life mission, warrants the type of harassment fostered by this legislation.

We cannot stand by when charitable agencies dedicated to welcoming new life in our city are singled out because they do not, as a matter of conscience cannot, participate in the work of others who would prevent that life. It is for this reason that the legislation demands our vocal and unrelenting opposition. the Archdiocese of Baltimore has worked tirelessly with you and all others of good will to bring hope where there is great despair, through our churches, our hospitals, our Catholic Charities, and our schools. We applaud the efforts of all those who share in that service, and whose outreach speaks to a belief that there is always reason to welcome a new life into our midst.

Our Holy Father, Pope Benedict the XVI, reminded us in his recent encyclical Caritas in Veritate – Love in Truth – that “openness to life is at the center of true development.” “If personal and social sensitivity towards the acceptance of a new life is lost,” he cautioned, “other forms of acceptance that are valuable for society also wither away.”

I urge you to turn your attention and your worthy service as council members to the urgent needs of our City, and to put to rest an once the distraction that this legislation has needlessly placed before you. And as you do so, we continue to pledge our commitment to partnering with you in improving the lives of all residents of Baltimore City, and to building hope for the lives of those who will inherit the fruits of our labor.

Leave a Reply

Archdiocese Staff

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce nunc enim, consequat ac nunc eu.

En español »